Florida’s State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo has recommended against males aged 18 to 39 receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines owing to an 84% increase in the incidence of heart-related death within 28 days following mRNA vaccination. Here is the press release.
Today, State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo has announced new guidance regarding mRNA vaccines. The Florida Department of Health (Department) conducted an analysis through a self-controlled case series, which is a technique originally developed to evaluate vaccine safety.
This analysis found that there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination. With a high level of global immunity to COVID-19, the benefit of vaccination is likely outweighed by this abnormally high risk of cardiac-related death among men in this age group. Non-mRNA vaccines were not found to have these increased risks.
As such, the State Surgeon General recommends against males aged 18 to 39 from receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Those with preexisting cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, should take particular caution when making this decision.
“Studying the safety and efficacy of any medications, including vaccines, is an important component of public health,” said Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. “Far less attention has been paid to safety and the concerns of many individuals have been dismissed – these are important findings that should be communicated to Floridians.”
The analysis can be found here. The guidance can be found here.
The move follows on from Denmark ending vaccination of most under-50s, though any safety considerations in that decision were left implicit.
The Florida recommendation is based on a new analysis of deaths following vaccination undertaken by the state Department of Health, one of the first detailed analyses of all-cause mortality by vaccination status that has been carried out.
The analysis stressed that it is only considering doses given during the “first months the vaccines were available” and did not include vaccinations after December 8th 2021.
It also excluded anyone with a documented COVID-19 infection or who was registered with a COVID-19 associated death, meaning any interaction between COVID-19 infection and vaccine adverse event was not considered.
The analysis states that for the two-dose mRNA vaccines, an individual’s risk in the 28-day post-injection period was compared to the later post-injection period, which has the problem that the heightened risk of heart complications may well continue after 28 days. It also excludes anyone who received a booster (i.e., a third or fourth dose). This means, the analysis says, that it “does not consider the multidose vaccination schedule required for mRNA vaccination”. This is important as other analyses have suggested later doses are associated with significantly heightened risk ofheartcomplicationsanddeath.
The analysis also does not include those under 18, though adolescents have been found in otherstudiesto be particularly susceptible to heart-related vaccine adverse events.
Concerning the finding that non-mRNA vaccines (i.e., the Janssen vaccine in this context) did not have elevated risk, the analysis says this “could be due to confounding” as the population who received the Johnson vaccine may have been younger and healthier. This “needs to be further evaluated”, it adds.
The Florida recommendation against mRNA vaccination for young males on safety grounds is an important step towards seeing the new genetic vaccines in their proper light. However, full analysis of all-cause and heart-related mortality by vaccination status across the whole rollout and for all doses is still awaited.
Please read and include the following “Scientific Proof of Lethality” of alleged “COVID-19 Vaccines”:
“Over a Thousand Scientific Studies Show That COVID-19 Vaccines Are Dangerous, and Those Pushing This Agenda Commit the Indictable Crime of Gross Misconduct in Public Office.”
Just over a year after the deployment of the COVID 19 emergency use experimental vaccines, thousands of scientific studies, and reports of criminal complaints of assault and murder from the illegal, unlawful use of biochemical poisons made to police forces across the country confirm an assault on an unsuspecting UK population.
Irrefutable research indicates that the COVID 19 vaccination is not safe or efficient in decreasing SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus transmission or infection.
The “safe and effective” misleading propaganda spread by public officials who are now promoting this vaccination is a clear breach of duty.
A public office holder is subject to, and is aware of, a duty to prevent death or serious injury caused solely by the activities of the public office.
Many have violated that duty, putting themselves and others at risk of death or serious damage by continuing to administer COVID 19 injections despite the now-confirmed risks.
Blood coagulation, myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, Bell’s palsy, Guillain-Barre syndrome, malignancy, and mortality are among the hazards.
All of this is confirmed by the following science-and-government-gathered data on vaccine harm from the UK Health and Security department on COVID 19.
The term “vaccine” was recently redefined to include this illegal, unlawful medical experiment in order to allow the use of mRNA technology that is plainly not a vaccination and contains biologically harmful nano-metamaterials connected with 5G urban data collection capability.
Metal nanoparticulates are known to be genotoxic—a toxin that can also cause sterilization—in science.
The dangers that this medical battery poses to sufferers in the short term are now known.
However, due to the devastating effects it has on the immune system, creating Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, the long-term lethality of this weapon has yet to be realised (AIDS).
We can now validate the 2017 depopulation defense-intelligence documents, which detail the intended death of over 55 million people across the United Kingdom using this biological weapon by 2025.
Before the deployment, the Medicines and Healthcare (products) Regulatory Agency (MHRA) was warned of the predicted significant number of adverse reactions, indicating the premeditated character of the crime and public behaviour offences then and now.
Cerebral venous thrombosis after COVID-19 vaccination in the UK: a multicentre cohort study:
Hello health buffs, pals, and covid mRNA vaccinated people. This communication is easily understood by non-scientists and non-doctors. It is meant to help you understand mRNA immunisation. A specialist in cancer, mental health, heart illness, and immune system problems, I have spent over two decades studying DNA and RNA. You may be asking why people throughout the world have been protesting the vaccine mandate for almost two and a half years now. All of your hatred for the vaccinated and all of your admiration for godly governance is utterly false and uncalled for. This remark is not founded on philosophy or propaganda, but rather a desperate attempt to gain likes, forwards, and virality. For no other reason than to uphold the medical profession’s pretentious commitment to help all people tirelessly and selflessly without fear or financial benefit.
If this makes sense, continue reading…..
People worldwide now understand words like DNA, RNA, mRNA, PCR, and RTPCR, thus this should be easy to read and comprehend. If not, I vow to make it easy.
You study genomics, a branch of science that focuses on the little components of all living things called cells and their central control point DNA, which is contained in a nucleus. In 2002, when the first complete Human DNA sequence was read, I was told that the central dogma “the process by which the instructions in DNA are converted into a functional product” is a holy principal and almost never changes or reverses its path unless the event is very rare and one in millions, which occurs in diseases like HIV that causes AIDS.
This holy book principle that I have examined and published about millions of DNA and RNA study samples simply states: “A cell’s nucleus has DNA. This DNAS held the code for practically all functions of our billions of cells and the mechanism stays the same. If anything goes wrong, it is a regret of its sort. The cells divide, multiply, perm their activities, and eventually die a natural death inside the body. You’ll see why I keep repeating it. So keep reading….
To bind to other cells and perform duties, DNA inside the cell nucleus creates RNA, which carries the cell’s code. These processes occur continuously in your 30 TRILLION cells every day. Remember, DNA makes RNA, RNA makes proteins, never the other way around. This can be reversed by increasing the activity of an enzyme called “Reverse Transcriptase” in our bodies. You must have guessed that it denotes or aids in reversing some scientific process. Yes, the process from DNA to RNA to protein production is correct. This suggests that the process of RNA to DNA conversion is not natural and goes against the will of our Scientific Biological GOD.
Since mRNA is the cell’s messenger and helps manufacture proteins and conduct immunity in immune cells, it was the sweet idea of the Pharma Companies and Governments to make vaccines made of synthetic mRNA, hence the name mRNA vaccine. This is supposed to create only proteins that help boost our immune system to combat covid 19.
Friends You can either read it yourself, or have it read to you by a friend or simply translate it using the Google translate app, which will do a better job than the scientists who created the so-called revolutionary vaccine that we are taking and retaking, and considering taking as boosters or even a regular, yearly vaccine in the future.
This is the article’s main point. I quit my vital work to write and rewrite this post for non-scientists to understand what happens following immunizations produced due to insufficient and risky lab work.
Weight Gain and obesity have long been linked to a sedentary lifestyle. Also there has been a consensus relating all cause weight gain to excess calories intake. Considerable and extensive research suggests that weight loss mechanisms of diet control often almost relates to the belief of the person in the diet that helps him or her to follow the diet strictly to gain on weight loss regime.